Hello Guest! Kumusta!

Thank you for visiting PiPho Forum!
It would be best if you will register so you can use the additional benefits of the community such as joining events, interacting with fellow members and view the hidden boards of the forum.

Mabuhay, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Sorry, this shoutbox does not exist.

Recent Classifieds Posts

Recent Forum Posts

adidas campus by likesups
[Yesterday at 07:17:39 PM]

adidas adilette by Jesse Temple
[Yesterday at 11:08:48 AM]

adidas ultra boost by Jesse Temple
[Yesterday at 11:03:16 AM]

Please recommend canon camera semi pro by likesups
[October 19, 2019, 07:23:48 PM]

Landscapes & Seascapes For All by likesups
[October 16, 2019, 08:42:20 PM]

Happy when It Rains by likesups
[October 14, 2019, 03:24:39 PM]

Life in New York by likesups
[October 12, 2019, 07:22:57 PM]

VRFPhotography by xcaliber14
[October 07, 2019, 09:53:08 AM]

FS: Nikon D850 dslr 45.7MP Camera body by fotoplace
[September 24, 2019, 07:11:49 PM]

Letting go of all or none at all. by wilybarrozo
[September 22, 2019, 09:41:27 PM]

Author Topic: Lens to replace the Canon kit-lens  (Read 1230 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CrispyParty

  • Ex - Org Officio
  • Trade Count: (70)
  • Robot
  • *********
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 1670
  • Liked: 4
  • Gender: Male
    • Underground Logic - VisualFX and Post production
  • Field: Landscape
Lens to replace the Canon kit-lens
« on: May 21, 2008, 02:56:30 AM »
Since I started phtography a few months ago, I've gone thru several lenses, either by borrowing from friends or by buying and selling again to try another lens, and have finally settled on a good range. (10-22, 24-70, and 70-300 from a friend).
Recently though, I've started to loook for the range of the 18-55 kit lens. I've narrowed down to 2 choices, the Canon 17-40 f4L or the Tamron 17-50 2.8. The Canon can be bought 2nd hand for about 20-24k, and the Tamron is about 17k brand new. I'm leaning towards the Tamron but some have spoken about back focus issues or a yellowish tinge in the images.
Can any of the users of either lenses give me an honest to goodness opinion on them? Sample images on the thread or links to personal sites are welcome. Thanks.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/crispyparty/  http://www.undergroundlogic.com "The best camera is the one that is with you" - Chase Jarvis

Pinoy Photography - Philippines Online Photography Community

Lens to replace the Canon kit-lens
« on: May 21, 2008, 02:56:30 AM »

Offline marty_e

  • Trade Count: (42)
  • Ovalteenees
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2006
  • Posts: 67
  • Liked: 0
Re: Lens to replace the Canon kit-lens
« Reply #1 on: May 21, 2008, 10:54:52 AM »
I've owned the Tamron 17-50 f2.8 on a Nikon mount and just recently used one on my 40D for extended testing over the weekend. My experiences with both differ. My copy on the Nikon mount was really soft and had to be sent back to HK for calibration. The copy I used for the Canon was much improved but it may be apples to oranges due to different bodies. A friend went through 3 samples before finding one sharp enough for him. As for color cast, there is some orange-y hue that can easily be corrected with a little PP. I can email you samples later if you give me your email address. I can't upload RAW on photobucket for some odd reason. Oddly though for me, the Tamron on both copies was seemingly softer wide open and when I compared it with my EF 24-70 at f2.8, no contest... For the price though, i'd be a Tamron owner again if I found a good sharp copy.


Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
208 Replies
Last post March 20, 2012, 08:39:42 PM
by iwahmd
12 Replies
Last post June 18, 2008, 12:47:55 AM
by catchlight
32 Replies
Last post February 06, 2009, 09:34:15 PM
by ZD5
48 Replies
Last post October 02, 2009, 12:10:06 PM
by butchgo1025
0 Replies
Last post January 09, 2019, 01:06:17 PM
by wewoy_romero

Get this spot now imagesmith photography Two Stops Over