Author Topic: Nid Advice: Sigma 24-70 2.8/ Tamron 17-50 2.8 / Tamron 28-75 2.8 / tokina 28-70 (Read 8445 times)

revozak · « **Reply #100 on:** October 24, 2010, 10:06:53 AM »

I am getting a second hand Tammy 28-75 tomorrow for around 9K. Base on the reviews and sample shots, I think this is a good buy for me

chopot · « **Reply #101 on:** October 24, 2010, 12:50:56 PM »

Quote from: revozak on October 24, 2010, 10:06:53 AM

I am getting a second hand Tammy 28-75 tomorrow for around 9K. Base on the reviews and sample shots, I think this is a good buy for me

nice price ang mura

.. I am hoping it is in a great condition and a sharp copy

sir goodluck on your deal and Godbless

revozak · « **Reply #102 on:** October 25, 2010, 01:06:20 AM »

Quote from: chopot on October 24, 2010, 12:50:56 PM

nice price ang mura .. I am hoping it is in a great condition and a sharp copy
sir goodluck on your deal and Godbless

Thank you sir, I'll post some sample pics when I get it

According to the seller, it is in very good condition, no mold/scratch or any focusing issue. Little dust that cant almost be seen by the naked eye. Thorough inspection na lang ako mamaya... magdadala na rin ako ng batteries for front/back focus check hehehe.

revozak · « **Reply #103 on:** October 26, 2010, 08:19:19 PM »

Sample shots of Tamron 28-75mm f2.8 I acquired (second hand )

ISO400 Handheld, No Flash (nakalimutan ko eh hehehe)
Focus was on the letter E of the word TREK /
Distance = 1.7 feet from the subject @ 75mm

Crop at different aperture setting of the above photo

Mods, pakidelete na lang po kung inappropriate... Thanks

jeyps11_c · « **Reply #104 on:** December 23, 2010, 07:46:41 AM »

A little bit soft sa 2.8 to my liking but considering the price and pictures produced at other f-stops the Tamron looks good!

dna · « **Reply #105 on:** December 23, 2010, 07:08:53 PM »

Sigma 2470 2.8 if you have FF, or Tamron 17-50 2.8 if you have apsc

pojie1084 · « **Reply #106 on:** January 04, 2011, 08:43:28 PM »

sorry for reviving this post. but i am planning in getting a fast and bang for the buck lens.

im confused between the Tammy 17-50 and 28-75. which would you recommend?
i am planning in going to wedding photography and i'm more into portrait shots.

i own a nikon d5000 and the nikkor 35mm f1.8 lens.
don't want to sell this lens because it is a keeper.

pitbull · « **Reply #107 on:** January 04, 2011, 11:31:02 PM »

Quote from: pojie1084 on January 04, 2011, 08:43:28 PM

sorry for reviving this post. but i am planning in getting a fast and bang for the buck lens.

im confused between the Tammy 17-50 and 28-75. which would you recommend?
i am planning in going to wedding photography and i'm more into portrait shots.

i own a nikon d5000 and the nikkor 35mm f1.8 lens.
don't want to sell this lens because it is a keeper.

get the 17-50mm,yun may BIM

or better yet, upgrade to a D7000

philander · « **Reply #108 on:** January 05, 2011, 01:08:58 AM »

Quote from: pojie1084 on January 04, 2011, 08:43:28 PM

sorry for reviving this post. but i am planning in getting a fast and bang for the buck lens.

im confused between the Tammy 17-50 and 28-75. which would you recommend?
i am planning in going to wedding photography and i'm more into portrait shots.

i own a nikon d5000 and the nikkor 35mm f1.8 lens.
don't want to sell this lens because it is a keeper.

Portraits? I suggest 28-75
If you need wider FL, then 17-50

If you are getting a ultra wide angle lens, choose 28-75 to pair with a 12-24

kelvinz · « **Reply #109 on:** January 05, 2011, 01:17:39 AM »

Quote from: pitbull on January 04, 2011, 11:31:02 PM

get the 17-50mm,yun may BIM
or better yet, upgrade to a D7000

+1 and join the pitbull mafia! HAHAHAHA

pojie1084 · « **Reply #110 on:** January 05, 2011, 05:32:57 AM »

Quote from: pitbull on January 04, 2011, 11:31:02 PM

get the 17-50mm,yun may BIM
or better yet, upgrade to a D7000

no need to upgrade to D7000 yet.... hahahahaha... my camera is stl around 6months old hahahaha...
does the 28-75mm also have the BIM version?

oninpogi · « **Reply #111 on:** January 08, 2011, 09:48:13 AM »

mga masters anu ba mas maganda sigma 24-70 f2.8 or tamron 28-75 f2.8? gagamitin ko mostly on model photoshoots and car shows. my cam is a nikon d90? tia

bender · « **Reply #112 on:** January 08, 2011, 10:22:39 AM »

For events, i used my Tamron 28-75 as the range is ideal. 17-50 is too limiting. I don't have experience with the Sigma or the Tokina.

Marco · « **Reply #113 on:** January 09, 2011, 10:27:57 AM »

Quote from: jovin22 on August 04, 2010, 11:43:02 AM

just to make it clear about sa pagiisip ko hehe

1st: sigma 70-300 ex dg macro vs canon 75-300
reviews says panalong panalo ang 70-300 ng sigma sa sharpness, compared to canon,
and i believe 70-300 is built to match the OEM canon 75-300mm (but still di naman ako nasatisfied kaya binenta ko, sakto kaka-1month pa lang sakin din nagkita kami nung buyer hehehe.

2nd: sigma 70-200 f2.8 vs canon 70-200f4L
reviews says mas sharp ang canon, though i think its built to match the 70-200f2.8L pero f4 pa lang medyo sabit na si sigma

3rd is the question?? will 24-70f2.8 be a perfect alternative vs the expensive canon 24-70 f2.8?

jan ako nadududa. may ups and downs din kasi sigma para sakin hehehe

please share some sample pic of all users of either tamron or sigma and ofcourse the L

Interesado rin ako noon sa Sigma 24-70 kasi nga counterpart ito ng Canon L on that range. Nung nagsearch ako sa net regarding sa review at first hand experience sa lens na ito.. nadiscourage ako dahil mas marami ang negative comments dito kesa sa positive comments. One thing for sure, very soft daw ito when full open meaning f2.8, hindi raw usable. When I was given the chance to use it, they were right. Kelangan mo pang mag stop down to 2 full stops para ma achieve mo ang sharpnes nito meaning bandang f5.6 na. Sa focusing walang problema, mabilis kung sa pabilisan lang... pero aanhin mo ang photo na well focused nga pero nyarp naman (soft) hehehe...

Iniisip ko rin kung magtatamron ako...Either 28-75 f2.8 or 17-50 f2.8. pareho daw sharp ito depende na lang sa range na gusto mo. Na try ko na rin ang 17-50 f2.8, ok na rin ang f2.8 nya pwede na rin ipost sa FB mga kuha nito based on sharpness, basta wag lang ipapalaki like 8x10 and beyond kasi magiging obvious na ang softness sa full open nito. pag plano mong ipa blow up ung kuha nito, stop down ka ng f4 ok na...pag dating naman sa focusing nito, di naman nagfocus hunt habang ginagamit ko eh ang ilaw ko lang nuon dito ay isang 20watt na bombilya.

:-)

jc_MyMitsuPh · « **Reply #114 on:** January 09, 2011, 11:30:34 AM »

so bottom line mga sir, ano pinaka maganda dito sa tatlo?

Sigma 24-70 2.8/ Tamron 28-75 2.8 / tokina 28-70

thanbinh · « **Reply #115 on:** January 10, 2011, 09:18:35 PM »

I got myself the new killer kid on the block >>> Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM

ment · « **Reply #116 on:** January 11, 2011, 01:11:37 PM »

^^^^ How much? and where did you bought it ......

More Reviews please

if price is right, this might be a good alternative

pogzz505 · « **Reply #117 on:** January 11, 2011, 01:59:07 PM »

Quote from: thanbinh on January 10, 2011, 09:18:35 PM

I got myself the new killer kid on the block >>> Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM

yan ang dream lens ko..

17-50mm range..2.8 constant aperture..and OS for handheld slow shutter shots..

32k yata yan sa JT..

dito mo sir post ang reviews..

http://www.pinoyphotography.org/forum/index.php?topic=77009.0

Hello Guest! Kumusta!

Portal News

Recent Classifieds Posts

Recent Forum Posts

Author Topic: Nid Advice: Sigma 24-70 2.8/ Tamron 17-50 2.8 / Tamron 28-75 2.8 / tokina 28-70 (Read 8445 times)

Related Topics