!!

Hello Guest! Kumusta!

Thank you for visiting PiPho Forum!
It would be best if you will register so you can use the additional benefits of the community such as joining events, interacting with fellow members and view the hidden boards of the forum.

 
 
Mabuhay, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Portal News

Invalid feed.
Sorry, this shoutbox does not exist.

Recent Classifieds Posts

Recent Forum Posts

Happyfingers Shoots: Street Forward by happyfingers
[Today at 02:48:43 AM]


Iba't-ibang Kalalakihan! by rubber duckie
[Yesterday at 08:59:59 PM]


Haring Araw - Sunrise & Sunset by PLeaSe
[Yesterday at 08:57:38 PM]


Ibat-ibang kababaihan... by zerosatest
[Yesterday at 04:13:05 PM]


SLR to Mirrorless by pitbull
[Yesterday at 03:13:00 PM]


Photo A Day in Monochrome by Oggy
[Yesterday at 02:21:55 PM]


Landscapes & Seascapes For All by mcCoy!
[Yesterday at 10:48:49 AM]


Photo-A-Day by mcCoy!
[Yesterday at 10:43:16 AM]


My Food Photography Shots by mcCoy!
[Yesterday at 10:41:16 AM]


Churches, Mosques, Synagogues etc - Places of Worship by mcCoy!
[Yesterday at 10:38:19 AM]



Author Topic: why nikon?  (Read 38326 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline teabag

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Tocino + Rice
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 207
  • Liked: 0
  • Gender: Male
why nikon?
« on: August 12, 2009, 12:48:36 AM »
A good read from another forum.
proud to be a nikonian.



>>>Why Nikon?
http://www.prestonmack.com/

The switch to Nikon
March, 2009




"The cover image doesn't look in focus."

My decision to switch camera systems from Canon to Nikon was cemented when I heard those words from an art director. It was a portrait shoot - simple, four light shoot, with an exposure of 1/250th at f6.3 at 250 ASA. Problem was, I was shooting with a 1D Mark III, Canon's flagship camera. Initially I thought all the AF issues were blown out of proportion. I had one of the first Mark III cameras in the country and thought that even though the new "AF" wasn't as good as I expected, it surely could not be as bad as the review I read on Rob Galbraith's site. When Canon announced that they would accept early Mark III cameras for the sub mirror fix and firmware update, I sent it in just to make sure. The camera that came back to me was inconsistent, unreliable and just unusable.

I have been a professional photographer for 15 years. I interned at both the Los Angeles Times and Palm Beach Post newspapers. I spent 5 years as a staff photographer for the Sun Sentinel in Ft Lauderdale. Even though the newspaper provided me with a complete set of Nikon equipment (2 N90 bodies, 20-35, 80-200, 50 macro and two flashes) I bought and used my personal Canon gear on all assignments that didn't involve rain or hurricanes.

I have owned and used most EOS series 1 cameras ever made: The EOS 1, EOS 1n, EOS 1V, DCS3, EOS 520, EOS 1D, EOS 1Dm2 and now the Mark III. I have covered all of the major sports (MLB, NHL, NBA, NASCAR, PGA, LPGA) and their championships. I shot over 200 NFL and NCAA football games in my life, including two Super Bowls and five NCAA D1 National Championship games. I know how a professional Canon AF camera is supposed to operate. I was even profiled in Canon EOS Magazine (with the cover story) in March 2000, talking about how amazing the EOS 1V was.I was a total Canon EOS fan boy.
WAS.
Of all the cameras that I have owned, the Canon EOS 1D Mark III is easily the worst performing AF camera.



My photo assignments differ greatly now that I am a full time professional freelancer. I primarily shoot advertising and corporate assignments for companies such as Disney, GM and Pillsbury. I also work for magazines that you have heard of (ESPN, Forbes, Business Week, etc) and many you have never heard of (CIO, CRN, Plan Sponsor, etc). I shoot 80% portrait and lifestyle type photos. My need for a great AF camera is much less than it was when I was a newspaper guy, but when I need it, I expect it to work. I need to know that my $4000 camera is going to do what I need it to do.


Photo by Preston Mack
ESPN The Magazine. Shot with a Canon Mark II digital camera and a 400mm 2.8.

During the early part of Spring Training 2008, I needed to decide for good if I was going to stick with Canon or switch. I tested a few different angles and situations at an Atlanta Braves pre-season game. It was a 1 pm start on a hot sunny day in Florida, and the camera couldn't perform. I was stunned how the focus tracking of the batters running toward me in the first base photo box weren't sharp. My overheads of Tim Hudson pitching weren't sharp anywhere in the frame. Photos of the Braves shortstop backlit (he wasn't moving) wasn't focused. I could no longer "trust" my Mark III.

I could have bought another Canon 5D to replace that camera body and keep all my Canon glass, but that is buying old technology which will soon be replaced. Also, that camera does not have a fast AF mechanism and frame rate for any sports coverage. I thought of getting the 1DSm3, but who knows if that camera has the same AF issues. And, at $8000, I am buying more camera than I want at this point. For a little more money (around $9400) you can get a complete Nikon kit with 2 Nikon D300's, the 3 fast Nikon zooms, and 2 flashes.


The rational choice was to switch to Nikon. Some have called this move extreme, but I think I made the only decision possible. As a freelancer, your reputation is on the line every time you take an assignment. Competition has never been tougher. A ruined shoot or two, you may lose a client forever. When that editor or art director moves on, he or she will remember that time you failed on that job.

Some may say that they cannot afford to do this - I say that if you value your photo career, you cannot afford NOT to do this. You must find a way to make sure your photography talent is not hindered by defective equipment. If you are a full time professional, you should be incorporated and have business credit.

After I got my 1DmIII back for the second time, I was told that Canon has different settings that shooters can set for different lighting conditions. Using these settings, there was an improvement in AF accuracy with my 1DmIII. However, I have a philosophical problem with this...

Why do I need to think about different custom function settings? I feel that the camera's AF should work great in ALL situations. With my EOS 1V, I never changed settings. With my EOS 1DmII, I never changed settings. Images from those cameras were in focus. On a shoot, I need to think about the lighting, the exposure and connecting with the subject. I do not need to think about the "-7 AF micro adjustment" or the CF settings #2 since it is a bright and sunny day.

The Nikon D3 requires no change in settings when you go from hot sun to an air conditioned room or from an action shoot to portrait job. The camera just works.

The only item that almost kept me from switching was the Canon 24 tilt shift lens. Yes, I am talking about a MANUAL focus lens. My last 3 advertising jobs were architecture/travel jobs that have taken me all across this country and to Hong Kong. That t/s lens and the full frame Canon 5D is a great combination, so I needed to test it against the full frame D3 and the new 24 Perspective Control lens from Nikon.

When I received the box from NPS, I could not be more impressed. The Nikon 24 PC lens has a great manual focus ring. It feels like those old time manual lenses with a smooth focusing feel. It focuses like my Hasselblad glass did. With the big viewfinder of the D3, manual focusing is a breeze. I will be using this combination for my next advertising job in May.

The first shoot I had with my Nikon gear was for Reader's Digest. They were flying me to Alabama for a portrait, so I had to read the manual on the plane ride. I haven't read a camera manual since my original EOS-1, but the menu system in the D300 is so vastly different from anything I have ever used before. Of course, everything was reversed (lenses, zoom ring and control dials all rotated the opposite direction and the exposure meter went the wrong way) and that slowed me down, but I managed. After analyzing the images, I was really impressed with how sharp the zooms are. I have always heard that the Nikon glass was better, but now I am know first hand.

The new Nikon 14-24mm f2.8 zoom has opened up a new world for me. I have never had a rectilinear 14mm lens on a full frame body before, and it really is amazing. I also cannot believe that lens so wide can be so sharp wide open. It is a very special everyday zoom lens, not just a specialty prime lens you need to throw on your camera. The only thing that concerns me is the front element of this zoom is huge and cannot take a filter. So, there will be no polarizer, ND or UV filter to help protect the front element.

The 24-70 f2.8 zoom will probably be my "main" lens. For my Canon jobs, I would try to switch out to prime lenses during portrait shoots because the Canon 24-70 is mushy in the 50 mm range, but the Nikon 24-70 is sharp - plenty sharp for portraiture. The Nikon 70-200 VR 2.8 is probably the sharpest zoom lens that I have ever used. The majority of my RD assignment was shot with this lens, at all focal lengths. I haven't had images that sharp since film.

Another improvement is the Nikon strobes. Canon strobes have always lagged behind Nikon's, and this is still true. I shot one wedding for my wife's business and we were able to compare the Canon 5D/580 EX combo against the D300/SB800 combo. The Nikon results were much more reliable and consistent. I rarely use on camera flash, so this isn't a major concern, but is worth noting.

I will not bore you with my detailed analysis of the D300 or D3. You all have heard how the high ISO images look great. TRUE. You have all heard how the AF is fast and reliable. TRUE. A few things that are not mentioned are the in-camera functions you can do. You can activate "D lighting" to any images you have shot, and it will reduce the contrast in an image and re save it as another file. You can also remove redeye in camera. You can also shoot it in low ISO (100 ASA and 160 ASA) and it records the image in low contrast. That is especially helpful when you have to shoot midday on a hot Florida day. The Capture NX raw converter is amazing. The level of control you have in program is unbelievable.

Many photographers emailed me asking if I switched and what my impressions of the new Nikon gear was. For me, I switched because the timing was right. Canon's flagship has a major defect, my EOS lenses were starting to show some age and more importantly, Nikon released a pair of the best digital SLRs ever made, the D300 and the D3. I could not be happier with them - it was not an easy to switch, but a necessary business decision.
...
Preston Mack






« Last Edit: August 12, 2009, 01:02:56 AM by teabag »

Pinoy Photography - Philippines Online Photography Community

why nikon?
« on: August 12, 2009, 12:48:36 AM »

Offline mar_carpeso

  • see the world from my perspective...
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tocino + Rice
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 218
  • Liked: 0
  • Gender: Male
  • see the world from my perspective...
    • thunder before the rain
Re: why nikon?
« Reply #1 on: August 12, 2009, 11:40:59 AM »
Makes me feel good I chose nikon...
I speak through my lens so you better listen with your eyes...
The only way you'll understand is to look closely...

http://www.flickr.com/photos/thunder_before_the_rain/

Offline sixpack

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Tocino + Rice
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2006
  • Posts: 212
  • Liked: 0
  • Gender: Male
Re: why nikon?
« Reply #2 on: August 12, 2009, 12:32:30 PM »
My primary reason for going Nikon is long term compatibility with new and old equipment. 

Offline robertalmario

  • Hobbyist!
  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Robot
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 2047
  • Liked: 59
  • Gender: Male
  • Terorismo? Si Gloria mismo!
    • robertalmario Photography
  • Camera: Canon, Nikon, Apple
  • Field: Landscape
  • Model: Canon 60D, Nikon J1, iPhone 5s
  • Nickname: Batman
Re: why nikon?
« Reply #3 on: August 12, 2009, 12:34:36 PM »
Mga brother at relatives ko eh canon kaya nikon naman ako.. hehhehe...

ergonimics!
http://robertalmario.com
Canon 60D - Nikon J1 - Canon 50mm f/1.8 II - Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 - Canon 430EX II - iMac 21" - Macbook Pro 13" - iPad 2 3G - iPhone 5s

Offline blueshadow

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Circulan
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 488
  • Liked: 18
  • Gender: Male
Re: why nikon?
« Reply #4 on: August 12, 2009, 12:39:10 PM »
for me? Blame it on Ke-ke-ke Ken Rockwell! ;D

Offline macswitch

  • corporate slave
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Circulan
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2006
  • Posts: 301
  • Liked: 0
  • Gender: Male
  • proud to be ka-LOMO!
    • Online Gallery
Re: why nikon?
« Reply #5 on: August 12, 2009, 01:27:02 PM »
why Nikon??




why not?
============================
           proud  to  be  ka-NIKON!
============================

Offline incubon

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Tocino + Rice
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 135
  • Liked: 0
    • Kitchen Stories and Bus Rides
Re: why nikon?
« Reply #6 on: August 12, 2009, 01:37:14 PM »
Sana magkaron na ng Nikon Philippines para todo todo na ang saya ng mga naka-Nikon  ;D
Trying Hard!

Offline Jeanick L. Dazo

  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Circulan
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 411
  • Liked: 3
  • Gender: Male
  • Chief HORNY GOAT
    • My Multiply
Re: why nikon?
« Reply #7 on: August 12, 2009, 01:50:40 PM »
for me?


Nikon all the way!

Since my FE days! hehehe!

Offline pinoy_pao

  • Trade Count: (26)
  • Robot
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 878
  • Liked: 1
  • Gender: Male
  • HORNY GOAT
    • Filipino Entrepreneur
Re: why nikon?
« Reply #8 on: August 12, 2009, 01:55:57 PM »
My primary reason for going Nikon is long term compatibility with new and old equipment. 

+1 on that, i can still use the old AIS full manual lenses on my nikon
14, 16, 20, 24, 35, 45, 50, 60, 85, 105, 135, 150, 200, 300
14-24, 16-35, 24-70, 24-120, 70-200, 50-500, 500

Offline argylecamacho

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tocino + Rice
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 219
  • Liked: 0
  • Gender: Male
    • my website
  • Camera: Nikon, Sony
  • Field: Landscape
  • Model: NEX-5, D800E, D3000IR
  • Nickname: arg
Re: why nikon?
« Reply #9 on: August 12, 2009, 02:07:20 PM »
Sana magkaron na ng Nikon Philippines para todo todo na ang saya ng mga naka-Nikon  ;D

+ infinity to what incubon said ;D

Offline coyski

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Circulan
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 421
  • Liked: 1
  • Gender: Male
Re: why nikon?
« Reply #10 on: August 12, 2009, 02:59:54 PM »
for me? Blame it on Ke-ke-ke Ken Rockwell! ;D

 ;D hahha natawa ko dito. yeah! ken rockwell for president! hahaha

Offline kpy555

  • Trade Count: (103)
  • Robot
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 2053
  • Liked: 48
  • Gender: Male
  • Pictures by Jordan
    • Pictures by Jordan
  • Camera: Nikon
  • Field: Portraiture
  • Model: D3s
Re: why nikon?
« Reply #11 on: August 12, 2009, 04:14:03 PM »
The fast and accurate AF is really something I admire on the D300/D700 when I use them to shoot sports. :)
Authorized Distributor of Belden Cables and Wires
D3s / D800 / D600 | 28 f1.8 G / 50 f1.4 G / 85 f1.4 G / 14-24 f2.8 G / 24-70 f2.8 G / 70-200 f2.8 G / 24-120 f4 G / TC-20E III

Offline pitbull

  • Impeous Man
  • Trade Count: (40)
  • Robot
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 6975
  • Liked: 954
  • Gender: Male
  • Patron ng mga Kolehiyala
    • Ang blog ng mga pogi
  • Camera: X20
  • Field: Landscape
  • Nickname: Ninong
Re: why nikon?
« Reply #12 on: August 12, 2009, 05:51:02 PM »
ergonomics din for me...i was supposed to buy a 400D but then i held a nikon unit just to see how it felt...and the rest,they say...is history  :o :o :o

Offline alegria_jojo

  • Trade Count: (18)
  • Robot
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 788
  • Liked: 22
  • Gender: Male
  • Camera: Nikon|Ricoh Camera
  • Field: Landscape
  • Model: Nikon D90|Ricoh GRD III
  • Nickname: Jojo
Re: why nikon?
« Reply #13 on: August 12, 2009, 06:14:19 PM »
I chose NIKON because:
1. compatibility to old NIKON lenses
2. ergonomics is better
3. color output is better
4. MATIBAY. kaya siguro hindi na kailangan ng NIKON Philippines maybe because minimal yung cases na nasisira na NIKON units and lenses.
    Pero much better kung meron support directly from NIKON para mas lalong masaya ang NIKONIANS.
What this "eye" sees is the greatest ever GR image quality GR DIGITAL III

Offline litogoz

  • Film Shooter
  • PiPho Org Member
  • Trade Count: (56)
  • Robot
  • *********
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 611
  • Liked: 51
  • Gender: Male
  • Take the shot!
  • Camera: Nikon Film & Digital
  • Field: Landscape
  • Model: D7K/S/F2/F3/F5/F100/FM2/FE2
  • Nickname: Lito
Re: why nikon?
« Reply #14 on: August 12, 2009, 06:32:24 PM »
Two reasons: sharp optics & because I have old Nikkor lenses.
1. It's called grain...not noise.
2. It's called ASA or DIN...not ISO.

Offline dokmadrid

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tocino + Rice
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 148
  • Liked: 2
  • Gender: Male
  • Camera: Pentax Spotmatic
  • Field: Travel
Re: why nikon?
« Reply #15 on: August 12, 2009, 06:37:28 PM »
sabi kasi ni Manny

"i-Nikon mo!"

Offline flxrms

  • HGT
  • Trade Count: (41)
  • Robot
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 1597
  • Liked: 11
  • Gender: Male
  • Field: Portraiture
  • Nickname: Felix Pogi
Re: why nikon?
« Reply #16 on: August 12, 2009, 07:08:15 PM »
nikon ako kasi yun binibilhan ko dati pwede hulugan hehehe :P
Sometimes, by concentrating only on the cup, we fail to enjoy the coffee.
Savor the coffee, not the cups!

Offline Adrian Jose

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Ovalteenees
  • ***
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 60
  • Liked: 2
  • Gender: Male
    • Adrian Checa Photography
  • Field: Landscape
Re: why nikon?
« Reply #17 on: August 12, 2009, 07:40:28 PM »
Nikon kasi ang alam ko dati kapag Canon e p&s lang. :D

Offline SADIK_527

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Robot
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 750
  • Liked: 5
  • Gender: Male
  • I am not poor, I'm just broke.
    • http://www.pbase.com/picture_element/root
  • Camera: Nikon
  • Field: Landscape
  • Model: LX5, D300s,S3,P7800
  • Nickname: Willie
Re: why nikon?
« Reply #18 on: August 12, 2009, 08:42:32 PM »

   why nikon?

Because of that Red Triangle below the shutter release button. Pag naka harap ako sa camera at nakita ko yung red thingy na yon nai_in_love ako kay Nikon. :)

 
"You cannot claim to have seen something until you have a photograph of it."   - Emile Zola    |                                                                      http://www.pbase.com/picture_element/root  |      http://www.flickr.com/photos/willie_cc/

Offline alfredborja

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Ovalteenees
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 58
  • Liked: 0
  • Gender: Male
Re: why nikon?
« Reply #19 on: August 12, 2009, 08:49:15 PM »
Ergonomics and backwards compatibility.

---------------------------------
Photography Student

Tags:
 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
14 Replies
1644 Views
Last post November 20, 2006, 01:36:32 PM
by jrj
276 Replies
30251 Views
Last post January 09, 2008, 11:29:00 AM
by tekgik
6 Replies
1130 Views
Last post January 11, 2008, 12:20:00 AM
by iampoch
41 Replies
6463 Views
Last post August 20, 2009, 05:18:52 AM
by coy82


Get this spot now imagesmith photography Two Stops Over