!!

Hello Guest! Kumusta!

Thank you for visiting PiPho Forum!
It would be best if you will register so you can use the additional benefits of the community such as joining events, interacting with fellow members and view the hidden boards of the forum.

 
 
Mabuhay, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Portal News

Sorry, this shoutbox does not exist.

Recent Classifieds Posts

Recent Forum Posts

Post your Bike pictures here by cadiok69
[Today at 10:21:24 PM]


OM-D User Sample Images by cadiok69
[Today at 10:20:11 PM]


Olympus OM-D E-M5 Users Thread - Post discussions here by junji
[Today at 10:17:53 PM]


Still Life by stellar
[Today at 10:09:10 PM]


BOKEH Shoots by stellar
[Today at 10:06:12 PM]


Flora anyone? by stellar
[Today at 09:37:10 PM]


Aperture & Shutter Exposure Values Chart by jvdejesus05
[Today at 09:12:04 PM]


Super Studio Flash Packages! Super Affordable and Big Savings! Grab it now! by Blinderact
[Today at 08:34:27 PM]


F/S Panasonic Lumix LX7 by mikeD70s
[Today at 08:32:36 PM]


X20 user impressions by pitbull
[Today at 07:57:46 PM]



Author Topic: Sensor size, ISO and sensor technology  (Read 717 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jovijovijovi

  • jovijovijovi
  • PiPho Org Officer
  • Trade Count: (20)
  • Robot
  • *********
  • Join Date: Feb 2007
  • Posts: 1604
  • Liked: 36
  • Gender: Male
    • Snapshots and Stories
Sensor size, ISO and sensor technology
« on: August 27, 2008, 02:25:00 PM »
Hi! please move this thread or merge if necessary.

Assumptions? (plese correct): Newer sensors are better at reducing noise caused by high ISO. but high megapixels given the same sensor size causes more noise. But since the sensor technology is newer, it is better at controlling noise.

Therefore If both at a fixed ISO:
40d at 10 MP (older sensor)
50d set at 10 MP (example may option)(newer sensor)

The 50d image is better than the 40d image? Is this true ALWAYS or does another factor affect this?

Thanks!
Snapshots and Stories at blogspot | Snapshots and Stories at tumblr | flickr jovijovijovi
"Eventually, prize winning photos/videos would mean very little compared to photos/videos of family & friends"


Offline pubert

  • Ex - Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Robot
  • **********
  • Join Date: Oct 2006
  • Posts: 2104
  • Liked: 6
  • Gender: Male
    • tomato
  • Field: Landscape
  • Nickname: mike
Re: Sensor size, ISO and sensor technology
« Reply #1 on: August 27, 2008, 03:13:40 PM »
some developments why the 50D sensor might be better than the 40D sensor even though individual pixels are smaller:

Quote
"The 50D sensor and image processing are a major step forward in what has been a multi-year strategy for Canon to take sensor technology to the limits of physics, simultaneously achieving higher ISOs, lower noise and higher dynamic range.  Note Chuck Westall’s announcement that the 50D sensor has 1 to 1 and a half stops better noise than the 40D sensor despite the smaller pixels.  Several core strategies have been pursued simultaneously for this:

 
  • Reducing the micro lens gap to capture all the light hitting the sensor.  This has been highlighted in the 40D, 1D III and 1Ds III sensors and the new 50D sensor now achieves effective 100% coverage.  Only very minor improvements are expected from this point on (e.g. shaping the lenses towards the corners of the frame to capture angled light.)
  • Reducing the noise level of each pixel.  Canon have made changes over several generations of sensors to achieve this, bringing the amplifiers closer to each pixel, changing micro-circuit configuration and lowering voltages so the sensor runs colder.  Again the design of the 50D is a big step forward here from the 40D and 1D III etc.  Canon have one more big jump lined up, with low voltage cold running CMOS designs to gain at least an additional stop in lower noise at higher ISOs or long exposures.
  • Better digital noise reduction. These are the changes in DIGIC noise processing.  First with the Chroma Noise reduction in DIGIC III and now with more advanced multi-level noise reduction options in DIGIC IV.  Canon believe they have made most of the gains possible via processing algorithms but do still have some areas to develop.  The next focus will be faster noise reduction processing so that it does not come at an impact on frame burst rates (look to the 1D3 replacement for example)


from: http://northlight-images.co.uk/cameras/Canon_5d2_3d_7d.html

« Last Edit: August 27, 2008, 03:17:01 PM by pubert »


Offline kengo

  • I have seen the light!
  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Robot
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2006
  • Posts: 1803
  • Liked: 10
    • Photos by Ken Go
Re: Sensor size, ISO and sensor technology
« Reply #2 on: August 27, 2008, 07:34:30 PM »
In camera processing are the biggest factor in noise control and not the sensors, so a newer camera with a better image processor will yield photos with less noise.

Ken

Offline voodoo

  • 35mm
  • Trade Count: (32)
  • Robot
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2006
  • Posts: 1132
  • Liked: 0
  • Gender: Male
  • Fanatic
    • Fanatic Photographers Society
Re: Sensor size, ISO and sensor technology
« Reply #3 on: August 28, 2008, 11:16:59 AM »
yes, IQ and noise control would depend a lot on the image processor too (eg. Digic III for canon) :D
EOS 1D MkIII | EF 16-35mm f2.8L MkII | EF 24-70mm f2.8L | EF 70-200mm f2.8L IS | EF 100mm f2.8 Macro | EF 85mm f1.8 | EF 50mm f1.4 | 580EXII | 430EXII


Tags:
 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
36 Replies
3793 Views
Last post May 04, 2006, 08:30:23 PM
by rogerpogi
296 Replies
50559 Views
Last post December 22, 2010, 12:37:42 PM
by streetunka
36 Replies
3301 Views
Last post February 12, 2007, 10:05:40 AM
by nitro
0 Replies
497 Views
Last post November 20, 2008, 09:28:52 PM
by HartSord
24 Replies
1536 Views
Last post August 26, 2010, 07:18:41 AM
by Gideon


Get this spot now imagesmith photography Two Stops Over